August, 2009 Archives
Aug
organising spreads.
by Yukino B. in Uncategorized
Whenever I do a spread, I usually copy it into the journal directly, whether from the book or from the internets. But since I’ve filled four notebooks already, it’s hard to return to a particular spread.
Yesterday I finally sat down with my notebooks and a binder, and organised all spreads from various places into one. I’ve got a few left on my HDD that I’ll copy once my laptop is fixed, and also a couple in my current journal — these I’ll handle once I move onto a different notebook.
It felt so great to finally consolidate them all. And my Tarot binder is growing! Ah, satisfaction.
Aug
shadowscapes tarot book
by Yukino B. in Uncategorized
This is definitely a great companion for the upcoming deck!
If only I were $35 (or $50? Can I dream?) richer, I’d be buying this right now.
Aug
article reference — llewellyn’s revitalising tarot practice.
by Yukino B. in Uncategorized
Revitalising Your Tarot Practice, Part I: Decks.
This is a good article on spicing up your usual reading routine if you feel a bit stuck, bored, or in a rut.
Bored with Tarot? Well, it happens. It’s happening to me right now, albeit in a different light — I’m not bored as I am stuck. Starting a blog was actually one of the ways I had hoped to battle this.
I’m currently reading with two decks RWS and Pagan, and feel like I don’t know either one of them well enough, even though they’ve been my companions for a while now. There are also two decks that I bought a year and a half and a year ago, and I have barely moved to explore them.
One could say that it’s happening because the decks aren’t “mine” — and indeed, I can’t seem to tune into them — nor am I trying hard, really. One has imagery that’s a bit unexpected, another one seems to have meanings that aren’t too deep for me.
Not that I’m too deep a person, I’m actually pretty shallow, but when I dive into Tarot, I usually look for symbolism.
Either there isn’t any, or I’m looking in a wrong place.
I tried one of the techniques described in the article before — the comparative approach. I used it to study one of the newer decks. And perhaps this is where I made the mistake — I was looking for similarities where there aren’t any. Different decks usually want to be used for different readings, and perhaps that particular deck wasn’t meant for the reading I was doing.
It’s all so vague, isn’t it? I wish I had a more solid example.